Analysis Of Twelve Angry Men - 1758 Words

â€Å"Twelve Angry Men† is an American film in which one person – Juror No8 – was able to convince the other 11 Jurors to vote â€Å"not guilty† in a murder trial, although all jurors pre-voted otherwise in the first minutes of counseling. The speeches of Juror No8 can provide a valuable example of different effective negotiation techniques. Thus, the aim of this paper is to analyze negotiation strategies of Juror No8 and to show how they can be used in personal and professional life to reach a certain goal. The first technique applied by Juror No8 is imagining a situation from personal perspective. He started cautiously with referring to his own actions in similar situation and used such phrases as â€Å"I kept putting myself in the kids place†¦Ã¢â‚¬ , â€Å"If†¦show more content†¦In the movie, Juror No8 made other jurors consider the situation from two perspectives - assuming that the boy on trial is guilty (â€Å"Supposing he did kill his father†¦.†) and assuming that the boy is not guilty (â€Å"Supposing they [facts] are wrong†¦?†, â€Å"Supposing the boy is not guilty†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ) (â€Å"12 Angry Men†, 1957). Technique #2 can be effectively used in personal life in cases where you have to convince a member of your family or a friend to choose a vacation destination, a house to buy, or even choose a place to have dinner. To do that, you need to make your partner imagine a situation in which he/she is on vacation, in a house or a re staurant that you want. The strategy of Assumption can be effectively used in advertising in order to make consumers see how their lives will change â€Å"assuming† they have a product, for example, assuming how a woman would feel if she had an advertised brand bag or shoes. Advertising campaigns can also use Assumption strategy to compare two products – imagining using brand product vs the commonly used one. Generalization is another technique that helped Juror No8 to convince other jurors. It is a well-known Sherlock Holmes’ deductive method of investigation in which what is known to be true about all people is applied to a particular person. This strategy can also be called a rational–based approach in which the negotiator uses reason to convince the opponent (Lewicki et al., 2014). Juror No8 implemented this technique toShow MoreRelatedAnalysis on Twelve Angry Men1086 Words   |  4 PagesAnalysis on Twelve Angry Men The movie Twelve Angry Men portrays an array of group dynamics by including the structure and functioning of groups, as well as the different types of roles each character plays along with their conflicts. The film displays these elements through a jury deliberation and the joint effort and the functioning of several minds together to search for the truth. These are just a few characteristics of group dynamics at work that is seen throughout the film. Group Purpose andRead MoreAnalysis Of The Movie Twelve Angry Men 890 Words   |  4 PagesTwelve Angry Men Introduction The movie â€Å"Twelve Angry Men,† portrays the story of twelve jurors from different walks of life and how they came to a difficult decision regarding the life of an eighteen year old Puerto Rican defendant. The defendant is on trial for premeditated first degree murder of his father. The scene takes place in a New York City jury room. The evidence presented to the jury alleged the youth murdered his father with a switchblade the night of the murder. The story began atRead MoreAnalysis Of The Movie Twelve Angry Men 786 Words   |  4 Pageshas equal value These two topics seem very essential for a team effectiveness because it shows the accountability and value of each team member. The movie â€Å"Twelve angry men† is a perfect example to illustrate these two topics. In that movie, twelves men were assigned by the judge to decide if or not a young man murdered his father. These men came from different background, did not know each other but had something in common: the goal for which they found themselves in that team. Obviously, conflictRead MoreTwelve Angry Men Character Analysis948 Words   |  4 PagesTwelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, is a play about a jury trying to come to a verdict that will determine whether or not a teenage boy will be put on death row. The jury that is chosen for the case all come from very different pasts, and most of them have completely different morals and values. The clash of these different views and discussing the case reveal past experiences and prejudices that some of the men have. The dy namic between past experience and prejudices fuels their arguments, butRead MoreFilm Analysis: Twelve Angry Men2007 Words   |  9 PagesThe movie Twelve Angry Men is about a young man who is accused of stabbing his father to death. The twelve jurors have to decide whether the defendant is guilty or innocent. If the young man is found guilty, there is a mandatory death sentence (the jury needs to be unanimous in their decision). At the preliminary vote, eleven of the twelve jurors vote the young man guilty. Henry Fonda is the only one who voted the accused as not guilty because he doesnt want to send the defendant to the deathRead MoreAnalysis Of Twelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose2345 Words   |  10 PagesExtended Analysis Twelve Angry Men Justice is a concept that is crucial to a fair and just society. For hundreds of years, countries have developed constitutions and other documents in place to form justice for those within the country. In Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, the idea of justice is bounced around by twelve men on a jury. These men have the unthinkable decisions of whether a suspected murderer is given the death penalty or able to walk free. The jury in Twelve Angry Men made the mostRead MoreLeadership Analysis â€Å"Twelve Angry Men† Essay2868 Words   |  12 Pagesï » ¿ Leadership Analysis â€Å"Twelve Angry Men† Olu Adewumi NCLC 375: Prof. Ampthor The movie â€Å"Twelve Angry Men† is about twelve male jurors, brought together in a deliberation room to decide whether a boy is guilty of killing his father. The deliberation starts with an 11-1 vote for guilty. As the movie progresses, the one man who had a reasonable doubt about the guilt or innocent of the young boy, convinces theRead MoreAnalysis of Conformity and Group Influence in Twelve Angry Men912 Words   |  4 PagesAnalysis of Conformity and Group Influence in Twelve Angry Men Introduction The film â€Å"Twelve Angry Men† directed by Sidney Lumet illustrates many social psychological principles. The tense, gripping storyline that takes place in the 1950s features a group of jurors who must decide unanimously whether a young man is guilty or innocent in the murder of his father. At the beginning, eleven of the twelve jurors voted guilty. Gradually, through some heated discussion, the jurors are swayed to a not-guiltyRead MoreAnalysis Of Twelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose754 Words   |  4 PagesThe statement â€Å"Drama reflects real life on a stage† is shown through the powerful dramatic play by Reginald Rose, ‘Twelve Angry Men’. Reginald rose through the effective use of characterisation, conflict and tension, symbolism, language and setting, Rose dramatically reflects human experiences with ‘Twelve Angry Men’. It is a play that directly appeals to our sense of justice and equality and questions audiences to contemplate the a rguments on a ‘fair trial’ in a judicial process when ‘reasonableRead MoreTwelve Angry Men Juror 8 Analysis1084 Words   |  5 PagesJustice or Freedom In the drama Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, juror 8 does a good job in persuading the other jurors to listen and reconsider the evidence. He uses his rhetorical appeals to captivate the other jurors attention. He gains an authority towards the other jurors which makes them trust him more. Juror 8 deconstructs the testimony and evidence with his rhetorical appeal to make the other jurors consider the innocence of the defendant. First, Juror 8 establishes his credibility to